This isn't the first we've heard of the new Star Wars Episode VII, and it certainly won't be the last. Especially with principal photography due to start anytime soon. So we should be hearing lots more casting news over the coming weeks.
The latest of this is the potential big bad being Adam Driver.
Known most recently for his role in the TV Show Girls, and a big screen outing for Inside Llewyn Davis, Driver may be a relative unknown to many. With names such as Hugo Weaving and Michael Fassbender also being linked to this project, many may wonder how Driver got a shoe in.
Some think that this is an indication that we may be in for a number of bad guys. I think it may just be a wise and inspired decision for revitalising the franchise.
What better way than to bring in relatively new blood as opposed to more 'household' names. It may simply be a move for longevity of character. If we're to expect more Star Wars episodes in future, and our bad guy is set to star across a few, aging will then start to become a factor.
Most likely he was the best man for the job, and all of these musings will be forgotten once he makes his first appearance.
Never the less, there's likely to be much more news to follow.
So it looks like the speculative talk has started again following an interview in which Karl Urban said talks were happening about bringing a Dredd sequel to production.
Much has been made of the hash job that was the marketing prior to the films cinematic release, which was the films ultimate downfall. Then came the fans, who propelled the film up the DVD sales and download charts. Something that I'm sure would give any potential investors pause for thought. DVD and Blu Ray sales alone have brought in half of what the film made at the box office....worldwide!
It's no surprise then that talks are ongoing. What is important is that the people with the money, who make the decisions see that the strong following isn't going anywhere. There are several ways you can do this:
If you haven't already, buy a copy of the film! Blu-Ray, DVD, Digital, whichever.
Buy a copy of the one-shot follow up comic. Let's send a clear message that we want to see more Dredd. Go to your local comic book store, or pick up a digital copy from Amazon.
I don't want to live in a world where rubbish franchise after rubbish franchise can get churned out at the cinema.
I want to live in a world where the public can speak up, the fans can be heard, and we can see a great character brought back to the big screen where he belongs!!
What better way to start than by letting you watch this glorious trailer (again)...
After getting their first full length trailer aired on Jimmy Kimmel Live on Tuesday night, you'd be hard pushed to still be in the dark about Guardians of the Galaxy.
Scheduled for release later this year, Guardians of the Galaxy represents the first significant step into the unknown since the MCU gained centre stage back in 2008 with the cinematic release of Iron Man. I'm aware that all characters within the MCU require a certain suspension of disbelief. Also that this was tested, some might say, to it's limit when Thor took us on a whistle stop tour of his nine realms in The Dark World. There we were subjected to multiple alien races, fighting wars on far off planets. Even Aether toting Dark Elf Malekith, played by Christopher Eccleston.
One thing all of them has shared up to now, is an Earth in peril, and a hero/team of heroes fighting to save our bacon. It's safe to say that we're going to need to be a little more open minded on this one. The clue might be in the word galaxy.
Even though the appearance of Benicio del Toro gives us our tie back into the MCU as we currently know it, I for one am very keen to see where Marvel Studios runs with this one. If Guardians is a hit, the world (or galaxy) becomes Marvel Studios' oyster. Forget The Avengers and Phase 3, this has the potential to go way past that.
Glean what you will from the trailer, as many already have. I just intend to sit back and enjoy the ride!
I'm no film critic. I enjoy watching films, and I enjoy writing. Writing my blog is a nice outlet, and has the added bonus of helping me to write more regularly.
The upshot being that I can decide on the films I want to watch at the cinema. If I don't like the look of something I can avoid it, and then catch up with it when it arrives on Blu-Ray or an on demand service. The only time I try and make sure I see all releases, regardless of their genre, is Oscar season. I really enjoy watching the awards ceremonies, The Oscars and The BAFTAs. Like some, I love to make predictions on who and what will win. Congratulating myself when I get it right, telling myself how wrong the judges are when I don't. In order to do this, I am currently living at the cinema. As I do at this time every year. Sometimes this sees me having to sit through films that I'd rather not, to put it mildly. Other times, I uncover some gems that I would have otherwise avoided.
It's almost like the studios planned the whole thing out. Crazy right?!
August: Osage County was very much the latter. Even though it didn't look like the high octane, explosion riddled adventure that usually catches my eye, the more than impressive cast list made it difficult to ignore. Lead by Meryl Streep, there are also Chris Cooper, Ewan McGregor, Juliette Lewis, Benedict Cumberbatch and a stellar performance from Julia Roberts.
Osage County was adapted for the big screen by Tracy Letts, who also wrote the play from which it was developed. I was completely unfamiliar with the stage show, so I had no idea what was in store for me. Whether it has changed much, for better, or worse, I am not sure.
I'd be wrong if I didn't say that Meryl Streep steals the show with her depiction of Violet Weston. The matriarch of a dysfunctional family, all brought back to their childhood home in Oklahoma after a family tragedy. Her performance is mesmerising, and one that could very well see her claim her 4th Oscar win. That isn't to say the supporting cast doesn't do their bit. In particular Julia Roberts, playing daughter Barbara Weston. You could even argue that they share lead roles on screen together. The strength of the assembled cast is showcased in one of the best scenes of the film, a family dinner that sees them all gathered at once around the dinner table. Anyone who's endured an awkward family meal may well be watching that scene from behind their hands.
With great performances all round, August: Osage County is well worth a watch. Whether Meryl Streep wins her fourth Oscar from this remains to be seen. Whoever wins it, one things for sure this year. With the calibre and strength of the films this year, they'll be worthy winners.
Having burst onto our screens in 2004 as Kate Austen in Lost, Evangeline Lilly didn't seem to focus on turning small screen success into big screen roles.
Following the shows finale in 2010, Evangeline starred in Real Steel as Bailey Tallet (2011), having previously had a small part in The Hurt Locker (2008) as Jeremy Renner's wife. It seems, however, that the aim has merely been quality rather than quantity. Last year she made a welcome return to our screens in The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug. Here she played Tauriel, and Elven warrior. A character who will make a return this year in the final instalment, The Hobbit: There And Back Again.
Now, the rumour mill has fired up with news of meetings and talks with Marvel Studios. The thinking being that she will be joining Paul Rudd and Michael Douglas in Ant-Man. Slated for 2015 this is the start of Marvel's MCU Phase 3, and is being helmed by Edgar Wright.
We know that Michael Douglas is going to be Hank Pym, and Paul Rudd will be Scott Lang/Ant Man. Which led initially to the thinking that she would play Janet Van Dyne, aka Wasp. This would fit nice and snug with the Ant-Man story, as well as giving us another member of The Avengers in time for the 3rd Avengers film.
When Ant-Man was first announced and Edgar Wright was unveiled as director, there was speculation that Mary Elizabeth Winstead may join the project, and that she may have taken on the role of Wasp. Nothing further came of it, and this may now be dead in the water.
Another rumour is that we could see the introduction of Spider-Woman. As a character who has ties, not only to Ant-Man, but to S.H.I.E.L.D and HYDRA, this might not be so far off the mark. Talk of rights ownership immediately surfaced due to Sony owning the rights to Spider-Man. I can't imagine it being an issue though, even though similarly named, they are different characters. Unless their rights are somehow tied together in a way that we don't know about.
Either way, it looks as though Evangeline Lilly may be the latest addition to the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
Sorry about the last post. I am currently in the process of getting my blog verified with Technorati. One of the few things I am trying to do to increase my blogs visibility. I've also had a play around with the formatting, and I'm currently in the process of trying to set up a bespoke site for the blog. Trying to wrap my grey matter around HTML and CSS may take a little while though, but we'll see how it goes.
In the meantime, I would love to hear any thoughts or suggestions on the way it looks. I want to make sure it's easy enough to read, so if there are any issues in that department let me know.
Remakes, reboots, and re-imaginings have long been a hot topic, and the flames will be fanned once more with the recent release of RoboCop. Starring Joel Kinnaman, Gary Oldman, Michael Keaton and Samuel L. Jackson, this is a remake of the 1987 film of the same name.
It's safe to say that your opinion of this film will be greatly influenced by whether or not you were around for the original. I was, and when I first saw and heard that a remake was in development and being filmed, I was dismayed. The original RoboCop was simple, and brilliant. Even a massively troubled production and the compromises made to even receive an R rating in the States didn't stop it. The original film was heavily cut for both film and television, if you watch the director's cut you will get a real taste of Verhoeven's vision.
For those not familiar with the RoboCop story, the main element remains unchanged. Detective Alex Murphy is mortally wounded and brought back as our metallic titular character.
The Man vs. Machine element is obviously still present. It would be impossible for it not to be, this is RoboCop after all. This time around however, it has a more global feel. Unmanned drones are being used to bring an American brand of peace to the Middle East, but the idea of unmanned drones on American soil is one the public and politicians are not keen on.
We still have to massive corporation in the form of OmniCorp, with an OCP name drop towards the end to hint at further franchise action. They're still as corrupt, and it's still left to RoboCop to sort things out. The difference being that Murphy is aware of who he is. He is still very much controlled by OmniCorp, but his humanity is something they are using to further their agenda with integrating unmanned drones into the U.S.
Elements like Murphy's awareness, and OmniCorp's global reach are nice refreshing changes. It's nice to see that they've put a stamp of their own on this remake. Modernising and making it relevant to audiences today, the media spinning and cover ups being a very topical theme. All whilst keeping the core elements of the original. There are several places where new pays respect to old ("I wouldn't buy that for a dollar"), which certainly made me very happy.
Two very special mentions to Samuel L. Jackson and Hocus Pocus by Focus. Firstly, Jackson's character Pat Novak. Novak is a talk show host who has the opening and closing scenes of the film. His commentary throughout the film is, for me, what gives a satirical edge very similar to that of the original. It almost seems like Novak's journey through the film is a little poke of fun at some of the more Republican views of the U.S.
Secondly, the use of Hocus Pocus during a great action sequence, during which RoboCop is given a final test against a great many drones is just genius.
Overall, I have to say that RoboCop has to be one of the best remakes I have seen to date. One to watch whether you were around for the original or not.
Lone Survivor is a military action thriller telling the story of the doomed Operation Red Wings. Directed by Peter Berg, it stars Mark Wahlberg, Taylor Kitsch, Ben Foster, Emile Hersch and Eric Bana.
Before going to see the film, I'd heard lots of positive things about it. There were two things that I was concerned about though. Peter Berg in the director's chair, and the American military source material. Peter Berg's last directorial outing that dealt with the American military was Battleship. A dire film that contained one of the most ulceratingly jingoistic scenes in recent memory.
I understand that my being British, and not of military background means my perspective and opinion on the above scene is skewed. However, the entire film is a 131 minute tribute to the American Navy. Making the above 3 minutes completely unnecessary. A view that I am not entirely alone in having:
Anyway, I digress, so before I go off on a Battleship hating rant, let's bring it back to Lone Survivor. Where were we, yes, my reservations, as above. To my delight, my reservations were unwarranted. The film has the correct level of American heroism (they do not sweep all before them in a fiery wrath of hi tech weaponry), and even includes some non American heroism. It even manages to have a strong, multicultural, moral theme.
Based on actual events, and a book of the same name. Lone Survivor is a dramatic retelling of Operation Red Wings that took place on June 28, 2005. The aim of the mission was to locate, capture and kill a Taliban bad guy by the name of Ahmad Shah. Aiming to be quickly and quietly in then out, a small recon team of 4 was selected. They would be dropped off by helicopter several kilometres away, before hiking to the target area to locate Shah. Once Shah had been located and killed they would then radio for extraction.
Everything was going according to plan, right up until they reached the compound where Shah was hiding out. Then events took a turn for the worse, and 2 things mess up the whole operation. Firstly, the mountainous terrain stops them from using their radios to communicate with the base. Secondly, goat herders come across their location. They capture the goat herders, but then have the moral dilemma of whether to kill them and continue the mission, or release them and run.
Earlier in the film, during their mission briefing, the Seals talk about the Rules of Engagement (ROE). For U.S. Forces, the rules of engagement state:
"When U.S. Forces are attacked by unarmed hostile elements, mobs and/or rioters,
U.S. Forces should use the minimum force necessary under the circumstances, and proportional to the threat."
Two of the four Seals say they should eliminate the compromise and continue with the mission. The target has killed other Seals and they believe he should be eliminated at all costs. A third believes that the only thing to do is to follow the ROE and release the herders. Even if it means abandoning the mission. The team captain is conflicted, but finally agrees with the third Seal and they release the hostages.
One of the herders immediately runs to the Taliban to alert them, and they make short work of catching up to the Seals. The Seals are still struggling to make radio contact with their base so are left with no choice but to engage in a gun battle of four against many times their number. Severely outnumbered, the Seals get their arses kicked in a very brutal and graphic way. Imagine Black Hawk Down to the power of ten. Like Black Hawk Down, Lone Survivor still has an element of behind the scenes logistics hindering a rescue attempt, helicopter's being redeployed etc. However this plays a less prominent role. The focus in Lone Survivor is very much on the four man Seal Team on the ground.
As the title would suggest, there comes a point where only one of the Seals remains. Badly injured, and struggling to evade capture the Lone Survivor comes across a group of people who he assumes are Taliban. They are in fact Pashtun villagers, who take him in and protect him against the Taliban until he can be rescued by the Americans.
The film opens with actual footage of Seals in training, and closes with text explaining the code of the Pashtun Villagers which requires them to protect someone against their enemies no matter what the cost. A code similar to the ROE the Seals adhere to. This nicely encapsulates the strong morale theme of the film, a morality shared by both cultures. Following on from Battleship, this is a nice, and unexpected element from Peter Berg's film.
The film had been in development for quite some time, and with a budget of $40m, is not quite the heavyweight in budgetary terms of other films of it's type. If we again take Black Hawk Down as an example. A film made 13 years earlier that had a budget of $92m.
To ensure it went ahead, Mark Wahlberg, Peter Berg and several other members of the production team gave $1m each of their own money to get things started. To help further reduce production costs, Peter Berg took only the minimum salary allowed as director, in accordance with the Director's Guild of America. Many of the cast and crew also lowered their asking prices for wages as well. It's great to hear that in a world where budgets can be inflated by wages to the detriment of the production, that so many of the people involved were willing to make this sacrifice in order to tell this story.
Whilst there are undoubtedly dramatic embellishments on the actual accounts of what happened within the film, it doesn't go overboard. There are even differences of opinion in the real life account of events. In the heat of combat, such things are sure to happen. Regardless of this, the film that they have made as a result is compelling and a must watch. I also encourage anyone watching the film to also read up on the actual events of Operation Red Wings. A great example of morality being upheld even during war.
